Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Spectral Graph Convolutions for Population-based Disease Prediction

About

Exploiting the wealth of imaging and non-imaging information for disease prediction tasks requires models capable of representing, at the same time, individual features as well as data associations between subjects from potentially large populations. Graphs provide a natural framework for such tasks, yet previous graph-based approaches focus on pairwise similarities without modelling the subjects' individual characteristics and features. On the other hand, relying solely on subject-specific imaging feature vectors fails to model the interaction and similarity between subjects, which can reduce performance. In this paper, we introduce the novel concept of Graph Convolutional Networks (GCN) for brain analysis in populations, combining imaging and non-imaging data. We represent populations as a sparse graph where its vertices are associated with image-based feature vectors and the edges encode phenotypic information. This structure was used to train a GCN model on partially labelled graphs, aiming to infer the classes of unlabelled nodes from the node features and pairwise associations between subjects. We demonstrate the potential of the method on the challenging ADNI and ABIDE databases, as a proof of concept of the benefit from integrating contextual information in classification tasks. This has a clear impact on the quality of the predictions, leading to 69.5% accuracy for ABIDE (outperforming the current state of the art of 66.8%) and 77% for ADNI for prediction of MCI conversion, significantly outperforming standard linear classifiers where only individual features are considered.

Sarah Parisot, Sofia Ira Ktena, Enzo Ferrante, Matthew Lee, Ricardo Guerrerro Moreno, Ben Glocker, Daniel Rueckert• 2017

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Alzheimer's disease classificationTADPOLE
AUC100
28
Binary ClassificationTadpole CN vs MCI (test)
AUC100
20
Binary classification (CN vs MCI)NACC
AUC84.4
20
Binary ClassificationTadpole MCI vs AD (test)
AUC0.948
12
Binary ClassificationNACC CN versus AD
AUC100
8
ClassificationADHD PKU, KKI, NYU sites (combined)
AUC63.21
7
Binary ClassificationNACC MCI vs AD, All FPR [0, 1] (test)
AUC (NI)83.7
5
Binary ClassificationNACC MCI vs AD, Group 1 FPR [0, 0.33] (test)
AUC80.6
5
Binary ClassificationNACC MCI vs AD, Group 2 FPR [0.33, 0.67] (test)
AUC0.89
5
Binary ClassificationNACC MCI vs AD, Group 3 FPR [0.67, 1] (test)
AUC89.1
5
Showing 10 of 10 rows

Other info

Follow for update