Challenges in Data-to-Document Generation
About
Recent neural models have shown significant progress on the problem of generating short descriptive texts conditioned on a small number of database records. In this work, we suggest a slightly more difficult data-to-text generation task, and investigate how effective current approaches are on this task. In particular, we introduce a new, large-scale corpus of data records paired with descriptive documents, propose a series of extractive evaluation methods for analyzing performance, and obtain baseline results using current neural generation methods. Experiments show that these models produce fluent text, but fail to convincingly approximate human-generated documents. Moreover, even templated baselines exceed the performance of these neural models on some metrics, though copy- and reconstruction-based extensions lead to noticeable improvements.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Summarization | arXiv | ROUGE-27.42 | 76 | |
| Summarization | Pubmed | ROUGE-133.89 | 70 | |
| Data-to-text generation | MLB (test) | RG Precision99.9 | 22 | |
| Data-to-text generation | RotoWire (test) | Factual Support Score7.57 | 19 | |
| Data-to-text generation | ROTOWIRE (dev) | RG Score0.5429 | 12 | |
| Data-to-text generation | ROTOWIRE English (test) | RG Score54.3 | 12 | |
| Knowledge Selection | RotoWire-FG | Relation Generation P93.72 | 10 | |
| Data-to-text generation | German ROTOWIRE (DE-RW) (test) | RG Score54.4 | 8 | |
| Data-to-text generation | MLB (dev) | RG Score59.93 | 4 |