Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

In-Order Transition-based Constituent Parsing

About

Both bottom-up and top-down strategies have been used for neural transition-based constituent parsing. The parsing strategies differ in terms of the order in which they recognize productions in the derivation tree, where bottom-up strategies and top-down strategies take post-order and pre-order traversal over trees, respectively. Bottom-up parsers benefit from rich features from readily built partial parses, but lack lookahead guidance in the parsing process; top-down parsers benefit from non-local guidance for local decisions, but rely on a strong encoder over the input to predict a constituent hierarchy before its construction.To mitigate both issues, we propose a novel parsing system based on in-order traversal over syntactic trees, designing a set of transition actions to find a compromise between bottom-up constituent information and top-down lookahead information. Based on stack-LSTM, our psycholinguistically motivated constituent parsing system achieves 91.8 F1 on WSJ benchmark. Furthermore, the system achieves 93.6 F1 with supervised reranking and 94.2 F1 with semi-supervised reranking, which are the best results on the WSJ benchmark.

Jiangming Liu, Yue Zhang• 2017

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Constituent ParsingPTB (test)
F195.71
127
Dependency ParsingChinese Treebank (CTB) (test)
UAS89.4
99
Constituency ParsingPenn Treebank WSJ (section 23 test)
F1 Score94.2
55
Constituent ParsingCTB (test)
F1 Score91.81
45
Constituency ParsingWSJ Penn Treebank (test)
F1 Score94.2
27
Constituency ParsingCTB 5.1 (test)
F1 Score91.81
25
Dependency ParsingWSJ section 23 (test)
UAS96.2
10
Constituency ParsingCross-domain (Bio, Dialogue, Forum, Law, Literature, Review) (test)
Accuracy (Bio)86.33
3
Showing 8 of 8 rows

Other info

Code

Follow for update