Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Transitive Invariance for Self-supervised Visual Representation Learning

About

Learning visual representations with self-supervised learning has become popular in computer vision. The idea is to design auxiliary tasks where labels are free to obtain. Most of these tasks end up providing data to learn specific kinds of invariance useful for recognition. In this paper, we propose to exploit different self-supervised approaches to learn representations invariant to (i) inter-instance variations (two objects in the same class should have similar features) and (ii) intra-instance variations (viewpoint, pose, deformations, illumination, etc). Instead of combining two approaches with multi-task learning, we argue to organize and reason the data with multiple variations. Specifically, we propose to generate a graph with millions of objects mined from hundreds of thousands of videos. The objects are connected by two types of edges which correspond to two types of invariance: "different instances but a similar viewpoint and category" and "different viewpoints of the same instance". By applying simple transitivity on the graph with these edges, we can obtain pairs of images exhibiting richer visual invariance. We use this data to train a Triplet-Siamese network with VGG16 as the base architecture and apply the learned representations to different recognition tasks. For object detection, we achieve 63.2% mAP on PASCAL VOC 2007 using Fast R-CNN (compare to 67.3% with ImageNet pre-training). For the challenging COCO dataset, our method is surprisingly close (23.5%) to the ImageNet-supervised counterpart (24.4%) using the Faster R-CNN framework. We also show that our network can perform significantly better than the ImageNet network in the surface normal estimation task.

Xiaolong Wang, Kaiming He, Abhinav Gupta• 2017

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Video Object SegmentationDAVIS 2017 (val)
J mean32
1130
Object DetectionPASCAL VOC 2007 (test)
mAP63.2
821
Image RetrievalOxford5k (test)
mAP42.3
97
Image RetrievalParis6k (test)
mAP58
88
Image ClassificationVTAB v2 (test)
Mean Accuracy44.2
39
Instance Segmentation PropagationDAVIS 2017
J Mean32
14
One-shot Video Object SegmentationDAVIS 2017 (val)
J&F Mean29.4
11
Pose Keypoint PropagationJHMDB split 1 (val)
PCK@0.143.9
10
Semantic PropagationVideo Instance-level Parsing (VIP) 85 (test)
mIoU19.4
8
Part Instance PropagationVideo Instance-level Parsing (VIP) 85 (test)
APr vol5
8
Showing 10 of 10 rows

Other info

Follow for update