Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Compositional Human Pose Regression

About

Regression based methods are not performing as well as detection based methods for human pose estimation. A central problem is that the structural information in the pose is not well exploited in the previous regression methods. In this work, we propose a structure-aware regression approach. It adopts a reparameterized pose representation using bones instead of joints. It exploits the joint connection structure to define a compositional loss function that encodes the long range interactions in the pose. It is simple, effective, and general for both 2D and 3D pose estimation in a unified setting. Comprehensive evaluation validates the effectiveness of our approach. It significantly advances the state-of-the-art on Human3.6M and is competitive with state-of-the-art results on MPII.

Xiao Sun, Jiaxiang Shang, Shuang Liang, Yichen Wei• 2017

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
3D Human Pose EstimationHuman3.6M (test)
MPJPE (Average)30.6
547
3D Human Pose EstimationHuman3.6M (Protocol #1)
MPJPE (Avg.)48.3
440
3D Human Pose EstimationHuman3.6M (Protocol 2)
Average MPJPE48.3
315
Human Pose EstimationMPII (test)
Shoulder PCK94.3
314
3D Human Pose EstimationHuman3.6M Protocol 1 (test)
Dir. Error (Protocol 1)42.1
183
3D Human Pose EstimationHuman3.6M (subjects 9 and 11)
Average Error59.1
180
3D Human Pose EstimationHuman3.6M--
160
3D Human Pose EstimationHuman3.6M Protocol #2 (test)
Average Error48.3
140
3D Human Pose EstimationHuman3.6M (S9, S11)
Average Error (MPJPE Avg)59.1
94
3D Human Pose EstimationHuman3.6M S9 and S11 (test)
Dir. Error39.5
72
Showing 10 of 17 rows

Other info

Follow for update