Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Structure-measure: A New Way to Evaluate Foreground Maps

About

Foreground map evaluation is crucial for gauging the progress of object segmentation algorithms, in particular in the filed of salient object detection where the purpose is to accurately detect and segment the most salient object in a scene. Several widely-used measures such as Area Under the Curve (AUC), Average Precision (AP) and the recently proposed Fbw have been utilized to evaluate the similarity between a non-binary saliency map (SM) and a ground-truth (GT) map. These measures are based on pixel-wise errors and often ignore the structural similarities. Behavioral vision studies, however, have shown that the human visual system is highly sensitive to structures in scenes. Here, we propose a novel, efficient, and easy to calculate measure known an structural similarity measure (Structure-measure) to evaluate non-binary foreground maps. Our new measure simultaneously evaluates region-aware and object-aware structural similarity between a SM and a GT map. We demonstrate superiority of our measure over existing ones using 5 meta-measures on 5 benchmark datasets.

Deng-Ping Fan, Ming-Ming Cheng, Yun Liu, Tao Li, Ali Borji• 2017

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Meta-Measure 2 (Ground-Truth Switch)NC4K
Error Rate6
7
Meta-Measure 4 (Structural Sensitivity - Dilate)COD10K
Error Rate0.85
7
Meta-Measure 4 (Structural Sensitivity - Dilate)NC4K
Error Rate0.77
7
Meta-Measure 4 (Structural Sensitivity - Erode)COD10K
Error Rate1.34
7
Meta-Measure 4 (Structural Sensitivity - Erode)NC4K
Error Rate0.97
7
Meta-Measure 4 (Structural Sensitivity - Erode)Trans10K
Error Rate31
7
Meta-Measure 3 (Noise Sensitivity)Trans10K
Error Rate0.53
7
Meta-Measure 4 (Structural Sensitivity - Dilate)Trans10K
Error Rate20
7
Meta-Measure 1 (Semantic Alignment)CamoHR
Error Rate8.25
7
Meta-Measure 2 (Ground-Truth Switch)COD10K
Error Rate0.09
7
Showing 10 of 14 rows

Other info

Follow for update