Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Revisiting Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data in Deep Learning Era

About

The success of deep learning in vision can be attributed to: (a) models with high capacity; (b) increased computational power; and (c) availability of large-scale labeled data. Since 2012, there have been significant advances in representation capabilities of the models and computational capabilities of GPUs. But the size of the biggest dataset has surprisingly remained constant. What will happen if we increase the dataset size by 10x or 100x? This paper takes a step towards clearing the clouds of mystery surrounding the relationship between `enormous data' and visual deep learning. By exploiting the JFT-300M dataset which has more than 375M noisy labels for 300M images, we investigate how the performance of current vision tasks would change if this data was used for representation learning. Our paper delivers some surprising (and some expected) findings. First, we find that the performance on vision tasks increases logarithmically based on volume of training data size. Second, we show that representation learning (or pre-training) still holds a lot of promise. One can improve performance on many vision tasks by just training a better base model. Finally, as expected, we present new state-of-the-art results for different vision tasks including image classification, object detection, semantic segmentation and human pose estimation. Our sincere hope is that this inspires vision community to not undervalue the data and develop collective efforts in building larger datasets.

Chen Sun, Abhinav Shrivastava, Saurabh Singh, Abhinav Gupta• 2017

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Object DetectionPASCAL VOC 2007 (test)--
821
Object DetectionMS COCO (test-dev)
mAP@.558
677
Image ClassificationFood-101
Accuracy95.1
494
Image ClassificationStanford Cars
Accuracy96.2
477
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10
Accuracy98.1
471
Image ClassificationImageNet ILSVRC-2012 (val)
Top-1 Accuracy79.2
405
Image ClassificationFGVC Aircraft
Top-1 Accuracy93.1
185
Image ClassificationOxford-IIIT Pet
Accuracy96.7
161
ClassificationImageNet 1k (test val)
Top-1 Accuracy84.2
138
Image ClassificationOxford-IIIT Pets (test)
Mean Accuracy96.4
125
Showing 10 of 13 rows

Other info

Follow for update