Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Deep Functional Maps: Structured Prediction for Dense Shape Correspondence

About

We introduce a new framework for learning dense correspondence between deformable 3D shapes. Existing learning based approaches model shape correspondence as a labelling problem, where each point of a query shape receives a label identifying a point on some reference domain; the correspondence is then constructed a posteriori by composing the label predictions of two input shapes. We propose a paradigm shift and design a structured prediction model in the space of functional maps, linear operators that provide a compact representation of the correspondence. We model the learning process via a deep residual network which takes dense descriptor fields defined on two shapes as input, and outputs a soft map between the two given objects. The resulting correspondence is shown to be accurate on several challenging benchmarks comprising multiple categories, synthetic models, real scans with acquisition artifacts, topological noise, and partiality.

Or Litany, Tal Remez, Emanuele Rodol\`a, Alex M. Bronstein, Michael M. Bronstein• 2017

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Shape MatchingFAUST (test)
Mean Geodesic Error0.11
85
3D Shape CorrespondenceFAUST remeshed (test)
Mean Geodesic Error (x100)11
65
Non-isometric 3D shape matchingSMAL
Mean Geodesic Error42
58
Shape CorrespondenceSCAPE (test)
Shape Correspondence Error0.063
54
3D shape matchingFAUST (F)
Mean Geodesic Error (x100)11.1
35
3D shape matchingSCAPE S
Mean Geodesic Error (x100)17
35
3D shape matchingFAUST Anisotropic (F_a)
Mean Geodesic Error42
35
3D shape matchingSCAPE Anisotropic (S_a)
Mean Geodesic Error (x100)41
35
3D shape matchingFAUST original (test)
Mean Geodesic Error (x100)11.1
34
3D shape matchingSCAPE original (test)
Mean Geodesic Error (×100)17
34
Showing 10 of 26 rows

Other info

Follow for update