Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Good Semi-supervised Learning that Requires a Bad GAN

About

Semi-supervised learning methods based on generative adversarial networks (GANs) obtained strong empirical results, but it is not clear 1) how the discriminator benefits from joint training with a generator, and 2) why good semi-supervised classification performance and a good generator cannot be obtained at the same time. Theoretically, we show that given the discriminator objective, good semisupervised learning indeed requires a bad generator, and propose the definition of a preferred generator. Empirically, we derive a novel formulation based on our analysis that substantially improves over feature matching GANs, obtaining state-of-the-art results on multiple benchmark datasets.

Zihang Dai, Zhilin Yang, Fan Yang, William W. Cohen, Ruslan Salakhutdinov• 2017

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
ClassificationSVHN (test)--
182
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10 standard (test)--
68
Image ClassificationMNIST standard (test)--
40
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10 400 labels per class (test)
Accuracy85.59
22
Image ClassificationSVHN 1,000 labels (train)
Error Rate (%)4.25
15
Image ClassificationCIFAR10 4,000 labels (train)
Error Rate14.41
15
Semi-supervised classificationMNIST 100 labels statically binarized (test)
Error Rate (%)0.8
10
Image ClassificationSVHN 1k labeled 72k unlabeled (test)
Accuracy95.75
8
Showing 8 of 8 rows

Other info

Code

Follow for update