Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Positive-Unlabeled Learning with Non-Negative Risk Estimator

About

From only positive (P) and unlabeled (U) data, a binary classifier could be trained with PU learning, in which the state of the art is unbiased PU learning. However, if its model is very flexible, empirical risks on training data will go negative, and we will suffer from serious overfitting. In this paper, we propose a non-negative risk estimator for PU learning: when getting minimized, it is more robust against overfitting, and thus we are able to use very flexible models (such as deep neural networks) given limited P data. Moreover, we analyze the bias, consistency, and mean-squared-error reduction of the proposed risk estimator, and bound the estimation error of the resulting empirical risk minimizer. Experiments demonstrate that our risk estimator fixes the overfitting problem of its unbiased counterparts.

Ryuichi Kiryo, Gang Niu, Marthinus C. du Plessis, Masashi Sugiyama• 2017

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10 (test)
Accuracy84.7
3381
Image ClassificationSTL-10 (test)
Accuracy80.4
357
Out-of-Distribution DetectionCIFAR-10 (ID) vs SVHN (OOD) (test)
AUROC100
79
Image ClassificationF-MNIST (test)
Accuracy91.4
64
Positive-Unlabeled ClassificationCIFAR-10 (test)
Accuracy88.91
19
PvN classificationBinarized CIFAR
Accuracy77.2
18
Outlier DetectionIoT (test)
AUC91.18
17
Positive-Unlabeled LearningSVHN (test)
Accuracy0.8388
15
Positive-Unlabeled LearningSTL-10 (test)
Accuracy93.38
14
PvN classificationCIFAR Dog vs Cat
Accuracy71.8
12
Showing 10 of 52 rows

Other info

Follow for update