Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Learning Spatial-Temporal Regularized Correlation Filters for Visual Tracking

About

Discriminative Correlation Filters (DCF) are efficient in visual tracking but suffer from unwanted boundary effects. Spatially Regularized DCF (SRDCF) has been suggested to resolve this issue by enforcing spatial penalty on DCF coefficients, which, inevitably, improves the tracking performance at the price of increasing complexity. To tackle online updating, SRDCF formulates its model on multiple training images, further adding difficulties in improving efficiency. In this work, by introducing temporal regularization to SRDCF with single sample, we present our spatial-temporal regularized correlation filters (STRCF). Motivated by online Passive-Agressive (PA) algorithm, we introduce the temporal regularization to SRDCF with single sample, thus resulting in our spatial-temporal regularized correlation filters (STRCF). The STRCF formulation can not only serve as a reasonable approximation to SRDCF with multiple training samples, but also provide a more robust appearance model than SRDCF in the case of large appearance variations. Besides, it can be efficiently solved via the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM). By incorporating both temporal and spatial regularization, our STRCF can handle boundary effects without much loss in efficiency and achieve superior performance over SRDCF in terms of accuracy and speed. Experiments are conducted on three benchmark datasets: OTB-2015, Temple-Color, and VOT-2016. Compared with SRDCF, STRCF with hand-crafted features provides a 5 times speedup and achieves a gain of 5.4% and 3.6% AUC score on OTB-2015 and Temple-Color, respectively. Moreover, STRCF combined with CNN features also performs favorably against state-of-the-art CNN-based trackers and achieves an AUC score of 68.3% on OTB-2015.

Feng Li, Cheng Tian, Wangmeng Zuo, Lei Zhang, Ming-Hsuan Yang• 2018

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Visual Object TrackingLaSOT (test)--
444
Visual Object TrackingVOT 2016
EAO31.3
79
Visual TrackingVOT 2016 (test)
EAO0.313
70
Visual Object TrackingOTB 2013
AUC60.1
60
Visual Object TrackingOTB 2015
AUC68.3
58
Visual Object TrackingTC128 (test)
Success AUC60.1
26
Single Object TrackingVOT 2018 (test)
EAO0.345
26
Visual TrackingOTB 2015 (full)
Mean Overlap Precision79.6
23
Object TrackingVOT 2018
EAO0.345
19
Visual Object TrackingDTB70 (test)
AUC43.7
19
Showing 10 of 15 rows

Other info

Code

Follow for update