Is Second-order Information Helpful for Large-scale Visual Recognition?
About
By stacking layers of convolution and nonlinearity, convolutional networks (ConvNets) effectively learn from low-level to high-level features and discriminative representations. Since the end goal of large-scale recognition is to delineate complex boundaries of thousands of classes, adequate exploration of feature distributions is important for realizing full potentials of ConvNets. However, state-of-the-art works concentrate only on deeper or wider architecture design, while rarely exploring feature statistics higher than first-order. We take a step towards addressing this problem. Our method consists in covariance pooling, instead of the most commonly used first-order pooling, of high-level convolutional features. The main challenges involved are robust covariance estimation given a small sample of large-dimensional features and usage of the manifold structure of covariance matrices. To address these challenges, we present a Matrix Power Normalized Covariance (MPN-COV) method. We develop forward and backward propagation formulas regarding the nonlinear matrix functions such that MPN-COV can be trained end-to-end. In addition, we analyze both qualitatively and quantitatively its advantage over the well-known Log-Euclidean metric. On the ImageNet 2012 validation set, by combining MPN-COV we achieve over 4%, 3% and 2.5% gains for AlexNet, VGG-M and VGG-16, respectively; integration of MPN-COV into 50-layer ResNet outperforms ResNet-101 and is comparable to ResNet-152. The source code will be available on the project page: http://www.peihuali.org/MPN-COV
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image Classification | ImageNet-1k (val) | -- | 1453 | |
| Fine-grained Image Classification | CUB200 2011 (test) | Accuracy86.3 | 536 | |
| Image Classification | ImageNet (val) | Top-1 Accuracy77.07 | 354 | |
| Fine-grained Image Classification | Stanford Cars (test) | Accuracy92.9 | 348 | |
| Fine-grained visual classification | FGVC-Aircraft (test) | Top-1 Acc90.8 | 287 | |
| Image Classification | CUB-200 2011 | Accuracy88.7 | 257 | |
| Image Classification | ImageNet (val) | Top-1 Error38.51 | 72 | |
| Fine-grained Image Classification | Birds 1.0 (val) | Accuracy87.3 | 24 | |
| Fine-grained Image Classification | Aircrafts 1.0 (val) | Accuracy92.4 | 24 | |
| Fine-grained Image Classification | Cars 1.0 (val) | Accuracy93.4 | 23 |