Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Residual Gated Graph ConvNets

About

Graph-structured data such as social networks, functional brain networks, gene regulatory networks, communications networks have brought the interest in generalizing deep learning techniques to graph domains. In this paper, we are interested to design neural networks for graphs with variable length in order to solve learning problems such as vertex classification, graph classification, graph regression, and graph generative tasks. Most existing works have focused on recurrent neural networks (RNNs) to learn meaningful representations of graphs, and more recently new convolutional neural networks (ConvNets) have been introduced. In this work, we want to compare rigorously these two fundamental families of architectures to solve graph learning tasks. We review existing graph RNN and ConvNet architectures, and propose natural extension of LSTM and ConvNet to graphs with arbitrary size. Then, we design a set of analytically controlled experiments on two basic graph problems, i.e. subgraph matching and graph clustering, to test the different architectures. Numerical results show that the proposed graph ConvNets are 3-17% more accurate and 1.5-4x faster than graph RNNs. Graph ConvNets are also 36% more accurate than variational (non-learning) techniques. Finally, the most effective graph ConvNet architecture uses gated edges and residuality. Residuality plays an essential role to learn multi-layer architectures as they provide a 10% gain of performance.

Xavier Bresson, Thomas Laurent• 2017

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Node Classificationogbn-arxiv (test)
Accuracy71.69
382
Node ClassificationSquirrel (test)
Mean Accuracy37.6
234
Node ClassificationChameleon (test)
Mean Accuracy49.82
230
Node ClassificationTexas (test)
Mean Accuracy80
228
Graph Classificationogbg-molpcba (test)
AP26.7
206
Graph RegressionZINC (test)
MAE0.214
204
Node ClassificationWisconsin (test)
Mean Accuracy81.57
198
Node ClassificationOgbn-arxiv
Accuracy70.1
191
Node ClassificationCornell (test)
Mean Accuracy73.51
188
Graph RegressionPeptides struct LRGB (test)
MAE0.2477
178
Showing 10 of 76 rows
...

Other info

Follow for update