Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Improving the Gaussian Mechanism for Differential Privacy: Analytical Calibration and Optimal Denoising

About

The Gaussian mechanism is an essential building block used in multitude of differentially private data analysis algorithms. In this paper we revisit the Gaussian mechanism and show that the original analysis has several important limitations. Our analysis reveals that the variance formula for the original mechanism is far from tight in the high privacy regime ($\varepsilon \to 0$) and it cannot be extended to the low privacy regime ($\varepsilon \to \infty$). We address these limitations by developing an optimal Gaussian mechanism whose variance is calibrated directly using the Gaussian cumulative density function instead of a tail bound approximation. We also propose to equip the Gaussian mechanism with a post-processing step based on adaptive estimation techniques by leveraging that the distribution of the perturbation is known. Our experiments show that analytical calibration removes at least a third of the variance of the noise compared to the classical Gaussian mechanism, and that denoising dramatically improves the accuracy of the Gaussian mechanism in the high-dimensional regime.

Borja Balle, Yu-Xiang Wang• 2018

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
RegressionCommunities and Crime 1990 US Census / 1990 US LEMAS / 1995 FBI UCR (test (20%))
MSE (Mean)0.0182
78
RegressionCalifornia Housing Standard (test)
MSE0.5922
78
RegressionCriteo Sponsored Search Conversion Log (test)
MSE3.12e+3
78
Training ProcessCriteo Sponsored Search Conversion Log (train)
Training Time3.4281
5
Training ProcessCalifornia Housing (train)
Training Time0.291
5
Training ProcessCommunities and Crime (train)
Training Time (s)0.286
5
Showing 6 of 6 rows

Other info

Follow for update