Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Look at Boundary: A Boundary-Aware Face Alignment Algorithm

About

We present a novel boundary-aware face alignment algorithm by utilising boundary lines as the geometric structure of a human face to help facial landmark localisation. Unlike the conventional heatmap based method and regression based method, our approach derives face landmarks from boundary lines which remove the ambiguities in the landmark definition. Three questions are explored and answered by this work: 1. Why using boundary? 2. How to use boundary? 3. What is the relationship between boundary estimation and landmarks localisation? Our boundary- aware face alignment algorithm achieves 3.49% mean error on 300-W Fullset, which outperforms state-of-the-art methods by a large margin. Our method can also easily integrate information from other datasets. By utilising boundary information of 300-W dataset, our method achieves 3.92% mean error with 0.39% failure rate on COFW dataset, and 1.25% mean error on AFLW-Full dataset. Moreover, we propose a new dataset WFLW to unify training and testing across different factors, including poses, expressions, illuminations, makeups, occlusions, and blurriness. Dataset and model will be publicly available at https://wywu.github.io/projects/LAB/LAB.html

Wayne Wu, Chen Qian, Shuo Yang, Quan Wang, Yici Cai, Qiang Zhou• 2018

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Facial Landmark Detection300-W (Common)
NME0.0298
180
Facial Landmark Detection300-W (Fullset)
Mean Error (%)3.49
174
Facial Landmark Detection300W (Challenging)
NME5.19
159
Face AlignmentWFLW (test)
NME (%) (Testset)5.15
144
Facial Landmark DetectionWFLW (test)
Mean Error (ME) - All5.15
122
Facial Landmark DetectionAFLW Full
NME1.25
101
Face Alignment300W (Challenging)
NME0.0519
93
Facial Landmark DetectionCOFW (test)
NME0.0392
93
Face Alignment300W Common
NME2.98
90
Face Alignment300W Fullset (test)
NME3.49
82
Showing 10 of 84 rows
...

Other info

Follow for update