Similarity encoding for learning with dirty categorical variables
About
For statistical learning, categorical variables in a table are usually considered as discrete entities and encoded separately to feature vectors, e.g., with one-hot encoding. "Dirty" non-curated data gives rise to categorical variables with a very high cardinality but redundancy: several categories reflect the same entity. In databases, this issue is typically solved with a deduplication step. We show that a simple approach that exposes the redundancy to the learning algorithm brings significant gains. We study a generalization of one-hot encoding, similarity encoding, that builds feature vectors from similarities across categories. We perform a thorough empirical validation on non-curated tables, a problem seldom studied in machine learning. Results on seven real-world datasets show that similarity encoding brings significant gains in prediction in comparison with known encoding methods for categories or strings, notably one-hot encoding and bag of character n-grams. We draw practical recommendations for encoding dirty categories: 3-gram similarity appears to be a good choice to capture morphological resemblance. For very high-cardinality, dimensionality reduction significantly reduces the computational cost with little loss in performance: random projections or choosing a subset of prototype categories still outperforms classic encoding approaches.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entity Matching | Fodors-Zagats | F1 Score61.4 | 30 | |
| Entity Matching | Movies | F1 Score31.4 | 26 | |
| Entity Matching | Average (Febrl4, F.-Zagat, Bikes, eBooks, Movies) | F1 Score47.7 | 26 | |
| Entity Matching | Bikes | F1 Score47.6 | 26 | |
| Entity Matching | eBooks | F1 Score53.1 | 26 | |
| Entity Matching | Febrl4 | F1 Score45 | 26 |