Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Rethinking Spatiotemporal Feature Learning: Speed-Accuracy Trade-offs in Video Classification

About

Despite the steady progress in video analysis led by the adoption of convolutional neural networks (CNNs), the relative improvement has been less drastic as that in 2D static image classification. Three main challenges exist including spatial (image) feature representation, temporal information representation, and model/computation complexity. It was recently shown by Carreira and Zisserman that 3D CNNs, inflated from 2D networks and pretrained on ImageNet, could be a promising way for spatial and temporal representation learning. However, as for model/computation complexity, 3D CNNs are much more expensive than 2D CNNs and prone to overfit. We seek a balance between speed and accuracy by building an effective and efficient video classification system through systematic exploration of critical network design choices. In particular, we show that it is possible to replace many of the 3D convolutions by low-cost 2D convolutions. Rather surprisingly, best result (in both speed and accuracy) is achieved when replacing the 3D convolutions at the bottom of the network, suggesting that temporal representation learning on high-level semantic features is more useful. Our conclusion generalizes to datasets with very different properties. When combined with several other cost-effective designs including separable spatial/temporal convolution and feature gating, our system results in an effective video classification system that that produces very competitive results on several action classification benchmarks (Kinetics, Something-something, UCF101 and HMDB), as well as two action detection (localization) benchmarks (JHMDB and UCF101-24).

Saining Xie, Chen Sun, Jonathan Huang, Zhuowen Tu, Kevin Murphy• 2017

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image ClassificationImageNet
Top-1 Accuracy42.8
429
Action RecognitionKinetics-400
Top-1 Acc77.2
413
Action RecognitionUCF101
Accuracy96.8
365
Action RecognitionUCF101 (mean of 3 splits)
Accuracy96.8
357
Action RecognitionUCF101 (test)
Accuracy96.8
307
Action RecognitionSomething-something v1 (val)
Top-1 Acc48.2
257
Action RecognitionKinetics 400 (test)
Top-1 Accuracy77.2
245
Action RecognitionHMDB51
Top-1 Acc75.9
225
Action RecognitionHMDB-51 (average of three splits)
Top-1 Acc75.9
204
Video ClassificationKinetics 400 (val)
Top-1 Acc74.7
204
Showing 10 of 71 rows
...

Other info

Follow for update