Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Multi-modal Cycle-consistent Generalized Zero-Shot Learning

About

In generalized zero shot learning (GZSL), the set of classes are split into seen and unseen classes, where training relies on the semantic features of the seen and unseen classes and the visual representations of only the seen classes, while testing uses the visual representations of the seen and unseen classes. Current methods address GZSL by learning a transformation from the visual to the semantic space, exploring the assumption that the distribution of classes in the semantic and visual spaces is relatively similar. Such methods tend to transform unseen testing visual representations into one of the seen classes' semantic features instead of the semantic features of the correct unseen class, resulting in low accuracy GZSL classification. Recently, generative adversarial networks (GAN) have been explored to synthesize visual representations of the unseen classes from their semantic features - the synthesized representations of the seen and unseen classes are then used to train the GZSL classifier. This approach has been shown to boost GZSL classification accuracy, however, there is no guarantee that synthetic visual representations can generate back their semantic feature in a multi-modal cycle-consistent manner. This constraint can result in synthetic visual representations that do not represent well their semantic features. In this paper, we propose the use of such constraint based on a new regularization for the GAN training that forces the generated visual features to reconstruct their original semantic features. Once our model is trained with this multi-modal cycle-consistent semantic compatibility, we can then synthesize more representative visual representations for the seen and, more importantly, for the unseen classes. Our proposed approach shows the best GZSL classification results in the field in several publicly available datasets.

Rafael Felix, B. G. Vijay Kumar, Ian Reid, Gustavo Carneiro• 2018

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Generalized Zero-Shot LearningCUB
H Score53
250
Generalized Zero-Shot LearningSUN
H40
184
Zero-shot LearningCUB
Top-1 Accuracy58.6
144
Zero-shot LearningSUN
Top-1 Accuracy60
114
Image ClassificationCUB
Unseen Top-1 Acc60.3
89
Image ClassificationSUN
Harmonic Mean Top-1 Accuracy39.2
86
Zero-shot LearningCUB (unseen)
Top-1 Accuracy58.6
49
Generalized Zero-Shot LearningAWA1
S Score64
49
Generalized Zero-Shot LearningFLO
u (Unseen Acc)61.6
46
Zero-shot LearningFLO
Top-1 Accuracy70.3
46
Showing 10 of 26 rows

Other info

Code

Follow for update