Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

DADA: Deep Adversarial Data Augmentation for Extremely Low Data Regime Classification

About

Deep learning has revolutionized the performance of classification, but meanwhile demands sufficient labeled data for training. Given insufficient data, while many techniques have been developed to help combat overfitting, the challenge remains if one tries to train deep networks, especially in the ill-posed extremely low data regimes: only a small set of labeled data are available, and nothing -- including unlabeled data -- else. Such regimes arise from practical situations where not only data labeling but also data collection itself is expensive. We propose a deep adversarial data augmentation (DADA) technique to address the problem, in which we elaborately formulate data augmentation as a problem of training a class-conditional and supervised generative adversarial network (GAN). Specifically, a new discriminator loss is proposed to fit the goal of data augmentation, through which both real and augmented samples are enforced to contribute to and be consistent in finding the decision boundaries. Tailored training techniques are developed accordingly. To quantitatively validate its effectiveness, we first perform extensive simulations to show that DADA substantially outperforms both traditional data augmentation and a few GAN-based options. We then extend experiments to three real-world small labeled datasets where existing data augmentation and/or transfer learning strategies are either less effective or infeasible. All results endorse the superior capability of DADA in enhancing the generalization ability of deep networks trained in practical extremely low data regimes. Source code is available at https://github.com/SchafferZhang/DADA.

Xiaofeng Zhang, Zhangyang Wang, Dong Liu, Qing Ling• 2018

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image ClassificationSVHN 1000 labels (test)
Error Rate24.17
69
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10 4,000 labels (test)
Test Error Rate33.57
57
Image ClassificationTiny ImageNet 2,000 labels (test)
Error Rate29.73
7
Showing 3 of 3 rows

Other info

Follow for update