Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Diachronic Word Embeddings Reveal Statistical Laws of Semantic Change

About

Understanding how words change their meanings over time is key to models of language and cultural evolution, but historical data on meaning is scarce, making theories hard to develop and test. Word embeddings show promise as a diachronic tool, but have not been carefully evaluated. We develop a robust methodology for quantifying semantic change by evaluating word embeddings (PPMI, SVD, word2vec) against known historical changes. We then use this methodology to reveal statistical laws of semantic evolution. Using six historical corpora spanning four languages and two centuries, we propose two quantitative laws of semantic change: (i) the law of conformity---the rate of semantic change scales with an inverse power-law of word frequency; (ii) the law of innovation---independent of frequency, words that are more polysemous have higher rates of semantic change.

William L. Hamilton, Jure Leskovec, Dan Jurafsky• 2016

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Prediction-grounded correlation with output difference (JSD)SST-2
Spearman Correlation0.77
145
Correlation to Accuracy DifferenceCora
Correlation Coefficient0.13
117
Prediction-grounded correlation with accuracy differenceImageNet-100
Spearman Correlation-0.01
111
Correlation to Model Behavior DifferencesMNLI
Accuracy Correlation0.25
93
Correlation to Accuracy DifferenceOgbn-arxiv
Correlation Coefficient0.17
93
Correlation to Accuracy DifferenceFlickr
Correlation Coefficient0.35
92
Correlation to Accuracy Difference (Test 1)ImageNet-100 1.0 (test)
JSD Correlation to Accuracy Diff0.38
80
Prediction-grounded correlation with accuracy differenceSST-2
Spearman Correlation0.44
54
Graph similarity groundingFlickr
Accuracy Correlation0.24
31
Language similarity groundingSST-2
Accuracy Correlation0.02
31
Showing 10 of 15 rows

Other info

Follow for update