Adversarially Robust Optimization with Gaussian Processes
About
In this paper, we consider the problem of Gaussian process (GP) optimization with an added robustness requirement: The returned point may be perturbed by an adversary, and we require the function value to remain as high as possible even after this perturbation. This problem is motivated by settings in which the underlying functions during optimization and implementation stages are different, or when one is interested in finding an entire region of good inputs rather than only a single point. We show that standard GP optimization algorithms do not exhibit the desired robustness properties, and provide a novel confidence-bound based algorithm StableOpt for this purpose. We rigorously establish the required number of samples for StableOpt to find a near-optimal point, and we complement this guarantee with an algorithm-independent lower bound. We experimentally demonstrate several potential applications of interest using real-world data sets, and we show that StableOpt consistently succeeds in finding a stable maximizer where several baseline methods fail.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bayesian Optimization | Newsvendor | Cumulative Regret45.27 | 9 | |
| Bayesian Optimization | Six-Hump Camel | Final Cumulative Regret179 | 9 | |
| Bayesian Optimization | Portfolio Uniform | Final Cumulative Regret735 | 9 | |
| Bayesian Optimization | Portfolio Normal | Final Cumulative Expected Regret807.5 | 9 | |
| Bayesian Optimization | Three-Hump Camel | Final Cumulative Regret30.81 | 9 | |
| Bayesian Optimization | Ackley | Final Cumulative Expected Regret734.4 | 9 | |
| Bayesian Optimization | Hartmann | Cumulative Regret185.6 | 9 | |
| Bayesian Optimization | Hartmann Complicated | Final Cumulative Expected Regret173.4 | 9 | |
| Bayesian Optimization | Modified Branin | Final Cumulative Regret2.30e+3 | 9 |