Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Spectral Signatures in Backdoor Attacks

About

A recent line of work has uncovered a new form of data poisoning: so-called \emph{backdoor} attacks. These attacks are particularly dangerous because they do not affect a network's behavior on typical, benign data. Rather, the network only deviates from its expected output when triggered by a perturbation planted by an adversary. In this paper, we identify a new property of all known backdoor attacks, which we call \emph{spectral signatures}. This property allows us to utilize tools from robust statistics to thwart the attacks. We demonstrate the efficacy of these signatures in detecting and removing poisoned examples on real image sets and state of the art neural network architectures. We believe that understanding spectral signatures is a crucial first step towards designing ML systems secure against such backdoor attacks

Brandon Tran, Jerry Li, Aleksander Madry• 2018

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Backdoor DetectionCIFAR-10
TPR60.8
135
Backdoor DetectionGTSRB
TPR47.6
48
Time Series ForecastingPeMS03
MAEC18.389
39
Backdoor Defense in Time Series ForecastingPEMS03 v1 (full)
MAE (c)18.389
16
Poisoning Defense24 datasets averaged
Poison Accuracy37.17
13
Backdoor DetectionCIFAR-10 imbalanced µ=0.9, ρ=100 (test)
Badnets TPR29.7
13
Backdoor Sample DetectionCIFAR-10 balanced rho=1 (train test)
Badnets TPR93.1
13
Backdoor Sample DetectionCIFAR-10 imbalanced mu=0.9, rho=200 (train test)
Badnets TPR0.1
13
Backdoor DetectionCIFAR-10 imbalanced µ=0.9, ρ=2 (test)
Badnets TPR55.6
13
Backdoor Sample DetectionCIFAR-10 imbalanced mu=0.9, rho=10 (train test)
Badnets TPR35.2
13
Showing 10 of 11 rows

Other info

Follow for update