Representer Point Selection for Explaining Deep Neural Networks
About
We propose to explain the predictions of a deep neural network, by pointing to the set of what we call representer points in the training set, for a given test point prediction. Specifically, we show that we can decompose the pre-activation prediction of a neural network into a linear combination of activations of training points, with the weights corresponding to what we call representer values, which thus capture the importance of that training point on the learned parameters of the network. But it provides a deeper understanding of the network than simply training point influence: with positive representer values corresponding to excitatory training points, and negative values corresponding to inhibitory points, which as we show provides considerably more insight. Our method is also much more scalable, allowing for real-time feedback in a manner not feasible with influence functions.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case Deletion Diagnostics | MNIST binary subsample (test) | AUC-DEL Score2.51 | 11 | |
| High-value data removal | CIFAR10 binarized (test) | AUC (Data Elimination Impact)1.65 | 11 | |
| Case Deletion Diagnostics | Toxicity binary subsample (test) | AUC-DEL0.37 | 10 | |
| Case Deletion Diagnostics | AGnews binary subsample (test) | AUC-DEL0.86 | 10 | |
| News Classification | AG News subset targeted BERT-small (test) | AUC-DEL Plus-0.016 | 7 | |
| Text Classification | Toxicity BERT-small targeted Kaggle 2018 (test) | AUC-DEL+-0.008 | 7 | |
| Text Classification | Toxicity Nooverlap BERT-small | AUC-DEL Plus-0.008 | 7 | |
| Text Classification | Toxicity Kaggle targeted 2018 RoBERTa (test) | AUC-DEL+-0.004 | 7 |