Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Multi-Task Learning as Multi-Objective Optimization

About

In multi-task learning, multiple tasks are solved jointly, sharing inductive bias between them. Multi-task learning is inherently a multi-objective problem because different tasks may conflict, necessitating a trade-off. A common compromise is to optimize a proxy objective that minimizes a weighted linear combination of per-task losses. However, this workaround is only valid when the tasks do not compete, which is rarely the case. In this paper, we explicitly cast multi-task learning as multi-objective optimization, with the overall objective of finding a Pareto optimal solution. To this end, we use algorithms developed in the gradient-based multi-objective optimization literature. These algorithms are not directly applicable to large-scale learning problems since they scale poorly with the dimensionality of the gradients and the number of tasks. We therefore propose an upper bound for the multi-objective loss and show that it can be optimized efficiently. We further prove that optimizing this upper bound yields a Pareto optimal solution under realistic assumptions. We apply our method to a variety of multi-task deep learning problems including digit classification, scene understanding (joint semantic segmentation, instance segmentation, and depth estimation), and multi-label classification. Our method produces higher-performing models than recent multi-task learning formulations or per-task training.

Ozan Sener, Vladlen Koltun• 2018

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Semantic segmentationCityscapes (test)
mIoU68.84
1254
Semantic segmentationCityscapes
mIoU66.63
674
Depth EstimationNYU v2 (test)--
438
Image ClassificationOffice-Home (test)--
402
Image ClassificationCUB
Accuracy86.3
351
Semantic segmentationNYU v2 (test)
mIoU50.79
304
Depth EstimationNYU Depth V2
RMSE0.603
226
Surface Normal EstimationNYU v2 (test)
Mean Angle Distance (MAD)23.14
224
ClassificationCelebA
Avg Accuracy87.7
197
Semantic segmentationNYUD v2
mIoU38.89
169
Showing 10 of 80 rows
...

Other info

Follow for update