Agnostic Federated Learning
About
A key learning scenario in large-scale applications is that of federated learning, where a centralized model is trained based on data originating from a large number of clients. We argue that, with the existing training and inference, federated models can be biased towards different clients. Instead, we propose a new framework of agnostic federated learning, where the centralized model is optimized for any target distribution formed by a mixture of the client distributions. We further show that this framework naturally yields a notion of fairness. We present data-dependent Rademacher complexity guarantees for learning with this objective, which guide the definition of an algorithm for agnostic federated learning. We also give a fast stochastic optimization algorithm for solving the corresponding optimization problem, for which we prove convergence bounds, assuming a convex loss function and hypothesis set. We further empirically demonstrate the benefits of our approach in several datasets. Beyond federated learning, our framework and algorithm can be of interest to other learning scenarios such as cloud computing, domain adaptation, drifting, and other contexts where the training and test distributions do not coincide.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image Classification | EMNIST Dir(0.1) (test) | Test Accuracy68.7 | 28 | |
| Federated Learning Image Classification | DirtyMNIST | Max r_k(θ)-0.016 | 12 | |
| Image Classification | EMNIST alpha = 0.1 | Max r_k(theta)0.152 | 10 | |
| Federated Learning Classification | EMNIST dir(alpha=0.1) (test) | Max r_k(theta)0.144 | 10 | |
| Multi-class classification | SHL | Weighted Accuracy (%)78.11 | 7 | |
| Multi-class classification | Person Activity | Weighted Acc (%)58.39 | 7 | |
| Multi-class classification | SC-MA | Accuracy (Weighted)54.56 | 7 | |
| Multi-class classification | Fashion MNIST | Accuracy77.32 | 6 | |
| Activity Recognition | SHL | Success Attack Rate68.63 | 5 | |
| Activity Recognition | Person Activity | Success Attack Rate43.66 | 5 |