Beyond Confidence Regions: Tight Bayesian Ambiguity Sets for Robust MDPs
About
Robust MDPs (RMDPs) can be used to compute policies with provable worst-case guarantees in reinforcement learning. The quality and robustness of an RMDP solution are determined by the ambiguity set---the set of plausible transition probabilities---which is usually constructed as a multi-dimensional confidence region. Existing methods construct ambiguity sets as confidence regions using concentration inequalities which leads to overly conservative solutions. This paper proposes a new paradigm that can achieve better solutions with the same robustness guarantees without using confidence regions as ambiguity sets. To incorporate prior knowledge, our algorithms optimize the size and position of ambiguity sets using Bayesian inference. Our theoretical analysis shows the safety of the proposed method, and the empirical results demonstrate its practical promise.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy Selection | Random Frozen Lake Environment 3 | Max Score0.43 | 8 | |
| Policy Selection | Random Frozen Lake Environment 4 | Max Performance Score0.36 | 8 | |
| Off-policy policy selection | Ring environment 100 batches (Evaluation) | Max Utility Difference0.74 | 8 | |
| Off-policy policy selection | Chain environment 100 batches (Evaluation) | Max ∆U0.55 | 8 | |
| Policy Selection | Random Frozen Lake Environment 2 | Maximum Score0.3 | 8 | |
| Policy Selection | Frozen Lake Random 1 | Max Score0.31 | 8 |