HiGRU: Hierarchical Gated Recurrent Units for Utterance-level Emotion Recognition
About
In this paper, we address three challenges in utterance-level emotion recognition in dialogue systems: (1) the same word can deliver different emotions in different contexts; (2) some emotions are rarely seen in general dialogues; (3) long-range contextual information is hard to be effectively captured. We therefore propose a hierarchical Gated Recurrent Unit (HiGRU) framework with a lower-level GRU to model the word-level inputs and an upper-level GRU to capture the contexts of utterance-level embeddings. Moreover, we promote the framework to two variants, HiGRU with individual features fusion (HiGRU-f) and HiGRU with self-attention and features fusion (HiGRU-sf), so that the word/utterance-level individual inputs and the long-range contextual information can be sufficiently utilized. Experiments on three dialogue emotion datasets, IEMOCAP, Friends, and EmotionPush demonstrate that our proposed HiGRU models attain at least 8.7%, 7.5%, 6.0% improvement over the state-of-the-art methods on each dataset, respectively. Particularly, by utilizing only the textual feature in IEMOCAP, our HiGRU models gain at least 3.8% improvement over the state-of-the-art conversational memory network (CMN) with the trimodal features of text, video, and audio.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emotion Recognition in Conversation | IEMOCAP (test) | -- | 154 | |
| Emotion Recognition in Conversation | MELD | Weighted Avg F156.81 | 137 | |
| Conversational Emotion Recognition | IEMOCAP | Weighted Average F1 Score58.54 | 129 | |
| Emotion Recognition in Conversation | MELD (test) | -- | 118 | |
| Emotion Detection | EmoryNLP (test) | -- | 96 | |
| Dialogue Emotion Detection | EmoryNLP | Weighted Avg F134.48 | 80 | |
| Dialogue Emotion Detection | DailyDialog | Micro F1 (- neutral)0.519 | 27 | |
| Emotion Recognition in Conversation | DailyDialog (test) | F1 Score0.5201 | 16 | |
| User Satisfaction Estimation | JDDC | Accuracy59.7 | 14 | |
| User Satisfaction Estimation | MWOZ | Accuracy44.6 | 14 |