Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Multilingual Constituency Parsing with Self-Attention and Pre-Training

About

We show that constituency parsing benefits from unsupervised pre-training across a variety of languages and a range of pre-training conditions. We first compare the benefits of no pre-training, fastText, ELMo, and BERT for English and find that BERT outperforms ELMo, in large part due to increased model capacity, whereas ELMo in turn outperforms the non-contextual fastText embeddings. We also find that pre-training is beneficial across all 11 languages tested; however, large model sizes (more than 100 million parameters) make it computationally expensive to train separate models for each language. To address this shortcoming, we show that joint multilingual pre-training and fine-tuning allows sharing all but a small number of parameters between ten languages in the final model. The 10x reduction in model size compared to fine-tuning one model per language causes only a 3.2% relative error increase in aggregate. We further explore the idea of joint fine-tuning and show that it gives low-resource languages a way to benefit from the larger datasets of other languages. Finally, we demonstrate new state-of-the-art results for 11 languages, including English (95.8 F1) and Chinese (91.8 F1).

Nikita Kitaev, Steven Cao, Dan Klein• 2018

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Constituent ParsingPTB (test)
F195.77
127
Phrase-structure parsingPTB (§23)
F1 Score95.6
56
Constituent ParsingCTB (test)
F1 Score92.14
45
Constituency ParsingWSJ Penn Treebank (test)
F1 Score95.77
27
Constituency ParsingCTB 5.1 (test)
F1 Score91.75
25
Constituency ParsingCTB 5.0 (test)
F1 Score91.75
19
Constituency ParsingChinese Treebank 5.1 (test)
F1 Score91.75
13
Multilingual Constituency ParsingSPMRL 2013 2014 (test)
French Score87.42
13
Constituency ParsingFrench Treebank (FTB) SPMRL shared task (test)
F187.42
8
Showing 9 of 9 rows

Other info

Code

Follow for update