Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Beyond the Selected Completely At Random Assumption for Learning from Positive and Unlabeled Data

About

Most positive and unlabeled data is subject to selection biases. The labeled examples can, for example, be selected from the positive set because they are easier to obtain or more obviously positive. This paper investigates how learning can be ena BHbled in this setting. We propose and theoretically analyze an empirical-risk-based method for incorporating the labeling mechanism. Additionally, we investigate under which assumptions learning is possible when the labeling mechanism is not fully understood and propose a practical method to enable this. Our empirical analysis supports the theoretical results and shows that taking into account the possibility of a selection bias, even when the labeling mechanism is unknown, improves the trained classifiers.

Jessa Bekker, Pieter Robberechts, Jesse Davis• 2018

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Positive-Unlabeled Classification14 imbalanced datasets SCAR assumption macro-averaged
ROC AUC0.85
36
Positive-Unlabeled Classification14 imbalanced datasets SAR - 25% labeled
ROC-AUC0.8
12
Positive-Unlabeled Classification14 imbalanced datasets SAR - 50% labeled
ROC-AUC84
12
Positive-Unlabeled Classification14 imbalanced datasets SAR - 75% labeled
ROC-AUC0.85
12
Showing 4 of 4 rows

Other info

Follow for update