Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Latent Retrieval for Weakly Supervised Open Domain Question Answering

About

Recent work on open domain question answering (QA) assumes strong supervision of the supporting evidence and/or assumes a blackbox information retrieval (IR) system to retrieve evidence candidates. We argue that both are suboptimal, since gold evidence is not always available, and QA is fundamentally different from IR. We show for the first time that it is possible to jointly learn the retriever and reader from question-answer string pairs and without any IR system. In this setting, evidence retrieval from all of Wikipedia is treated as a latent variable. Since this is impractical to learn from scratch, we pre-train the retriever with an Inverse Cloze Task. We evaluate on open versions of five QA datasets. On datasets where the questioner already knows the answer, a traditional IR system such as BM25 is sufficient. On datasets where a user is genuinely seeking an answer, we show that learned retrieval is crucial, outperforming BM25 by up to 19 points in exact match.

Kenton Lee, Ming-Wei Chang, Kristina Toutanova• 2019

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Open Question AnsweringNatural Questions (NQ) (test)
Exact Match (EM)33.3
134
RetrievalMS MARCO (dev)
MRR@100.261
84
Open-domain Question AnsweringTriviaQA (test)
Exact Match47.1
80
Question AnsweringNatural Question (NQ) (dev)--
72
RetrievalTREC DL 2019
NDCG@1061.5
71
Passage retrievalTriviaQA (test)
Top-100 Acc85.5
67
Question AnsweringNQ (test)
EM Accuracy33.3
66
RetrievalNatural Questions (test)
Top-5 Recall69.8
62
Open-domain Question AnsweringTriviaQA open (test)
EM47.1
59
End-to-end Open-Domain Question AnsweringNQ (test)
Exact Match (EM)33.3
50
Showing 10 of 35 rows

Other info

Follow for update