Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Classification and Clustering of Arguments with Contextualized Word Embeddings

About

We experiment with two recent contextualized word embedding methods (ELMo and BERT) in the context of open-domain argument search. For the first time, we show how to leverage the power of contextualized word embeddings to classify and cluster topic-dependent arguments, achieving impressive results on both tasks and across multiple datasets. For argument classification, we improve the state-of-the-art for the UKP Sentential Argument Mining Corpus by 20.8 percentage points and for the IBM Debater - Evidence Sentences dataset by 7.4 percentage points. For the understudied task of argument clustering, we propose a pre-training step which improves by 7.8 percentage points over strong baselines on a novel dataset, and by 12.3 percentage points for the Argument Facet Similarity (AFS) Corpus.

Nils Reimers, Benjamin Schiller, Tilman Beck, Johannes Daxenberger, Christian Stab, Iryna Gurevych• 2019

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Qualitative Evaluation of Stance Distribution and Argument OrganizationAllsides Election
Informativeness1.84
8
Argument OrganizationAllsides Immigration
Coherence1.45
5
Argument OrganizationAllsides Education
Coherence1.7
5
Argument OrganizationAllsides National Security
Coherence1.44
5
Argument OrganizationPerspectrum Abolish nuclear weapons
Coherence1.84
5
Argument OrganizationPerspectrum All nations have a right to nuclear weapons
Coherence1.71
5
Argument OrganizationPerspectrum Social networking sites are good for our society
Coherence1.6
5
Argument OrganizationPerspectrum There is a need for developing tactical nuclear weapons
Coherence1.68
5
Argument OrganizationAllsides Politics
Coherence1.15
5
Argument OrganizationAllsides Gun Control
Coherence1.93
5
Showing 10 of 14 rows

Other info

Follow for update