Classification and Clustering of Arguments with Contextualized Word Embeddings
About
We experiment with two recent contextualized word embedding methods (ELMo and BERT) in the context of open-domain argument search. For the first time, we show how to leverage the power of contextualized word embeddings to classify and cluster topic-dependent arguments, achieving impressive results on both tasks and across multiple datasets. For argument classification, we improve the state-of-the-art for the UKP Sentential Argument Mining Corpus by 20.8 percentage points and for the IBM Debater - Evidence Sentences dataset by 7.4 percentage points. For the understudied task of argument clustering, we propose a pre-training step which improves by 7.8 percentage points over strong baselines on a novel dataset, and by 12.3 percentage points for the Argument Facet Similarity (AFS) Corpus.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qualitative Evaluation of Stance Distribution and Argument Organization | Allsides Election | Informativeness1.84 | 8 | |
| Argument Organization | Allsides Immigration | Coherence1.45 | 5 | |
| Argument Organization | Allsides Education | Coherence1.7 | 5 | |
| Argument Organization | Allsides National Security | Coherence1.44 | 5 | |
| Argument Organization | Perspectrum Abolish nuclear weapons | Coherence1.84 | 5 | |
| Argument Organization | Perspectrum All nations have a right to nuclear weapons | Coherence1.71 | 5 | |
| Argument Organization | Perspectrum Social networking sites are good for our society | Coherence1.6 | 5 | |
| Argument Organization | Perspectrum There is a need for developing tactical nuclear weapons | Coherence1.68 | 5 | |
| Argument Organization | Allsides Politics | Coherence1.15 | 5 | |
| Argument Organization | Allsides Gun Control | Coherence1.93 | 5 |