Monocular 3D Human Pose Estimation by Generation and Ordinal Ranking
About
Monocular 3D human-pose estimation from static images is a challenging problem, due to the curse of dimensionality and the ill-posed nature of lifting 2D-to-3D. In this paper, we propose a Deep Conditional Variational Autoencoder based model that synthesizes diverse anatomically plausible 3D-pose samples conditioned on the estimated 2D-pose. We show that CVAE-based 3D-pose sample set is consistent with the 2D-pose and helps tackling the inherent ambiguity in 2D-to-3D lifting. We propose two strategies for obtaining the final 3D pose- (a) depth-ordering/ordinal relations to score and weight-average the candidate 3D-poses, referred to as OrdinalScore, and (b) with supervision from an Oracle. We report close to state of-the-art results on two benchmark datasets using OrdinalScore, and state-of-the-art results using the Oracle. We also show that our pipeline yields competitive results without paired image-to-3D annotations. The training and evaluation code is available at https://github.com/ssfootball04/generative_pose.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3D Human Pose Estimation | Human3.6M (test) | MPJPE (Average)32.7 | 547 | |
| 3D Human Pose Estimation | Human3.6M (Protocol #1) | MPJPE (Avg.)46.8 | 440 | |
| 3D Human Pose Estimation | Human3.6M (Protocol 2) | Average MPJPE32.7 | 315 | |
| 3D Human Pose Estimation | Human3.6M Protocol 1 (test) | Dir. Error (Protocol 1)48.6 | 183 | |
| 3D Human Pose Estimation | Human3.6M | MPJPE58 | 160 | |
| 3D Human Pose Estimation | Human3.6M S9 and S11 (test) | -- | 72 | |
| 3D Pose Estimation | Human3.6M | -- | 66 | |
| 3D Human Pose Estimation | Human3.6M v1 (test) | Avg Performance53.4 | 58 | |
| 3D Human Pose Estimation | Human3.6M Standard Protocol | MPJPE46.8 | 19 | |
| 3D Human Pose Estimation | HumanEva-I (Walking) | S1 Error38.5 | 18 |