ZoomOut: Spectral Upsampling for Efficient Shape Correspondence
About
We present a simple and efficient method for refining maps or correspondences by iterative upsampling in the spectral domain that can be implemented in a few lines of code. Our main observation is that high quality maps can be obtained even if the input correspondences are noisy or are encoded by a small number of coefficients in a spectral basis. We show how this approach can be used in conjunction with existing initialization techniques across a range of application scenarios, including symmetry detection, map refinement across complete shapes, non-rigid partial shape matching and function transfer. In each application we demonstrate an improvement with respect to both the quality of the results and the computational speed compared to the best competing methods, with up to two orders of magnitude speed-up in some applications. We also demonstrate that our method is both robust to noisy input and is scalable with respect to shape complexity. Finally, we present a theoretical justification for our approach, shedding light on structural properties of functional maps.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shape Matching | FAUST (test) | Mean Geodesic Error0.061 | 85 | |
| 3D Shape Correspondence | FAUST remeshed (test) | Mean Geodesic Error (x100)6.1 | 65 | |
| Shape Correspondence | SCAPE (test) | Shape Correspondence Error0.075 | 54 | |
| Shape Matching | SCAPE remeshed (test) | Mean Geodesic Error (x100)7.5 | 46 | |
| Shape Matching | SHREC19 remeshed (test) | Mean Geodesic Error0.078 | 37 | |
| Near-isometric shape matching | SCAPE (test) | Mean Geodesic Error7.5 | 32 | |
| Non-isometric 3D shape matching | SMAL | Mean Geodesic Error0.384 | 22 | |
| Shape correspondence estimation | TOPKIDS | Geodesic Error (x100)33.7 | 19 | |
| Point cloud matching | 4DMatch (test) | NFMR4.2 | 16 | |
| Near-isometric shape matching | SCAPE (final 20 shapes) | Pointwise Geodesic Error7.5 | 16 |