Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Maintaining Discrimination and Fairness in Class Incremental Learning

About

Deep neural networks (DNNs) have been applied in class incremental learning, which aims to solve common real-world problems of learning new classes continually. One drawback of standard DNNs is that they are prone to catastrophic forgetting. Knowledge distillation (KD) is a commonly used technique to alleviate this problem. In this paper, we demonstrate it can indeed help the model to output more discriminative results within old classes. However, it cannot alleviate the problem that the model tends to classify objects into new classes, causing the positive effect of KD to be hidden and limited. We observed that an important factor causing catastrophic forgetting is that the weights in the last fully connected (FC) layer are highly biased in class incremental learning. In this paper, we propose a simple and effective solution motivated by the aforementioned observations to address catastrophic forgetting. Firstly, we utilize KD to maintain the discrimination within old classes. Then, to further maintain the fairness between old classes and new classes, we propose Weight Aligning (WA) that corrects the biased weights in the FC layer after normal training process. Unlike previous work, WA does not require any extra parameters or a validation set in advance, as it utilizes the information provided by the biased weights themselves. The proposed method is evaluated on ImageNet-1000, ImageNet-100, and CIFAR-100 under various settings. Experimental results show that the proposed method can effectively alleviate catastrophic forgetting and significantly outperform state-of-the-art methods.

Bowen Zhao, Xi Xiao, Guojun Gan, Bin Zhang, Shutao Xia• 2019

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Class-incremental learningCIFAR-100
Averaged Incremental Accuracy74.09
234
Class-incremental learningCIFAR100 (test)
Avg Acc69.28
76
Class-incremental learningCIFAR-100 10 (test)
Average Top-1 Accuracy69.46
75
Class-incremental learningImageNet-100
Avg Acc80.21
74
Class-incremental learningCIFAR100 B50 (test)
Average Accuracy71.43
67
Continual LearningCIFAR100 Split 32x32 (test)
Accuracy24
66
Continual LearningMiniImageNet Split 84x84 (test)
Accuracy18.9
66
Continual LearningSplit CIFAR10 32x32 (test)
Accuracy48.6
66
Class-incremental learningCIFAR-100
Average Accuracy70
60
Class-incremental learningCIFAR100-LT rho=100 (test)
Avg Acc32.07
48
Showing 10 of 85 rows
...

Other info

Follow for update