Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Detecting semantic anomalies

About

We critically appraise the recent interest in out-of-distribution (OOD) detection and question the practical relevance of existing benchmarks. While the currently prevalent trend is to consider different datasets as OOD, we argue that out-distributions of practical interest are ones where the distinction is semantic in nature for a specified context, and that evaluative tasks should reflect this more closely. Assuming a context of object recognition, we recommend a set of benchmarks, motivated by practical applications. We make progress on these benchmarks by exploring a multi-task learning based approach, showing that auxiliary objectives for improved semantic awareness result in improved semantic anomaly detection, with accompanying generalization benefits.

Faruk Ahmed, Aaron Courville• 2019

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
OOD DetectionFGVCAircraft
AUROC80.9
41
Image ClassificationAircraft
Base Accuracy88.5
28
OOD DetectionNorth American Birds Fine-grained OOD split
TNR@95%TPR23
14
OOD DetectionStanford Cars Fine-grained OOD
TNR@95%TPR53.9
14
OOD DetectionButterfly Fine-grained OOD
TNR@95%TPR32
14
OOD DetectionStanford Cars Coarse-grained OOD
TNR@9589
14
OOD DetectionNorth American Birds Coarse-grained OOD
TNR@9566.9
14
OOD DetectionFGVC-Aircraft Coarse-grained OOD split
TNR@95%TPR62
14
OOD DetectionButterfly Coarse-grained OOD
TNR9587.6
14
ID ClassificationBUTTERFLY
Accuracy88.7
9
Showing 10 of 12 rows

Other info

Follow for update