Smooth Shells: Multi-Scale Shape Registration with Functional Maps
About
We propose a novel 3D shape correspondence method based on the iterative alignment of so-called smooth shells. Smooth shells define a series of coarse-to-fine shape approximations designed to work well with multiscale algorithms. The main idea is to first align rough approximations of the geometry and then add more and more details to refine the correspondence. We fuse classical shape registration with Functional Maps by embedding the input shapes into an intrinsic-extrinsic product space. Moreover, we disambiguate intrinsic symmetries by applying a surrogate based Markov chain Monte Carlo initialization. Our method naturally handles various types of noise that commonly occur in real scans, like non-isometry or incompatible meshing. Finally, we demonstrate state-of-the-art quantitative results on several datasets and show that our pipeline produces smoother, more realistic results than other automatic matching methods in real world applications.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shape Matching | FAUST (test) | Mean Geodesic Error0.025 | 85 | |
| 3D Shape Correspondence | FAUST remeshed (test) | Mean Geodesic Error (x100)2.5 | 65 | |
| Shape Correspondence | SCAPE (test) | Shape Correspondence Error0.047 | 54 | |
| Shape Matching | SCAPE remeshed (test) | Mean Geodesic Error (x100)4.7 | 46 | |
| Shape Matching | SHREC19 remeshed (test) | Mean Geodesic Error0.076 | 37 | |
| Near-isometric shape matching | SCAPE (test) | Mean Geodesic Error4.7 | 32 | |
| Non-isometric 3D shape matching | SMAL | Mean Geodesic Error0.361 | 22 | |
| Shape correspondence estimation | TOPKIDS | Geodesic Error (x100)10.8 | 19 | |
| Near-isometric shape matching | FAUST (last 20 shapes) | Pointwise Geodesic Error2.5 | 16 | |
| Near-isometric shape matching | SCAPE (final 20 shapes) | Pointwise Geodesic Error4.7 | 16 |