Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Learning Modulated Loss for Rotated Object Detection

About

Popular rotated detection methods usually use five parameters (coordinates of the central point, width, height, and rotation angle) to describe the rotated bounding box and l1-loss as the loss function. In this paper, we argue that the aforementioned integration can cause training instability and performance degeneration, due to the loss discontinuity resulted from the inherent periodicity of angles and the associated sudden exchange of width and height. This problem is further pronounced given the regression inconsistency among five parameters with different measurement units. We refer to the above issues as rotation sensitivity error (RSE) and propose a modulated rotation loss to dismiss the loss discontinuity. Our new loss is combined with the eight-parameter regression to further solve the problem of inconsistent parameter regression. Experiments show the state-of-art performances of our method on the public aerial image benchmark DOTA and UCAS-AOD. Its generalization abilities are also verified on ICDAR2015, HRSC2016, and FDDB. Qualitative improvements can be seen in Fig 1, and the source code will be released with the publication of the paper.

Wen Qian, Xue Yang, Silong Peng, Yue Guo, Junchi Yan• 2019

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Oriented Object DetectionDOTA v1.0 (test)
SV70.2
378
Object DetectionDOTA 1.0 (test)
Plane AP90.1
256
Oriented Object DetectionDOTA (test)
AP (Plane)90.1
92
Object DetectionHRSC 2016 (test)
mAP@0.0786.5
72
Oriented Object DetectionDOTA v1.5 (test)--
58
Oriented Object DetectionHRSC 2016 (test)
mAP86.5
55
Object DetectionUCAS-AOD (test)
mAP96.5
27
Oriented Object DetectionDOTA single-scale 1.0 (test)
AP (PL)90.1
24
Rotation Object DetectionDOTA v2.0 (test)
AP5046.31
14
Rotation Object DetectionDOTA v1.0 (val)
AP5066.99
14
Showing 10 of 12 rows

Other info

Follow for update