Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Non-Rigid Structure from Motion: Prior-Free Factorization Method Revisited

About

A simple prior free factorization algorithm \cite{dai2014simple} is quite often cited work in the field of Non-Rigid Structure from Motion (NRSfM). The benefit of this work lies in its simplicity of implementation, strong theoretical justification to the motion and structure estimation, and its invincible originality. Despite this, the prevailing view is, that it performs exceedingly inferior to other methods on several benchmark datasets \cite{jensen2018benchmark,akhter2009nonrigid}. However, our subtle investigation provides some empirical statistics which made us think against such views. The statistical results we obtained supersedes Dai {\it{et al.}}\cite{dai2014simple} originally reported results on the benchmark datasets by a significant margin under some elementary changes in their core algorithmic idea \cite{dai2014simple}. Now, these results not only exposes some unrevealed areas for research in NRSfM but also give rise to new mathematical challenges for NRSfM researchers. We argue that by \textbf{properly} utilizing the well-established assumptions about a non-rigidly deforming shape i.e, it deforms smoothly over frames \cite{rabaud2008re} and it spans a low-rank space, the simple prior-free idea can provide results which is comparable to the best available algorithms. In this paper, we explore some of the hidden intricacies missed by Dai {\it{et. al.}} work \cite{dai2014simple} and how some elementary measures and modifications can enhance its performance, as high as approx. 18\% on the benchmark dataset. The improved performance is justified and empirically verified by extensive experiments on several datasets. We believe our work has both practical and theoretical importance for the development of better NRSfM algorithms.

Suryansh Kumar• 2019

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
3D ReconstructionMoCap
Drink Error0.0119
11
3D ReconstructionNRSfM Challenge Balloon
Reconstruction Error (mm)7.84
7
3D ReconstructionNRSfM Challenge Stretch
Reconstruction Error (mm)7.53
7
3D ReconstructionNRSfM Challenge Articul
Reconstruction Error (mm)16
7
3D ReconstructionNRSfM Challenge Paper
Reconstruction Error (mm)10.69
7
3D ReconstructionNRSfM Challenge Tearing
Reconstruction Error (mm)16.34
7
3D ReconstructionH3WB One-circle-type camera motion (Sparse NRSfM sequences)
Eating 2 Error0.0633
6
3D ReconstructionH3WB Multi-circle-type camera motion Sparse NRSfM sequences
Eating Error (Seq 2)0.0335
6
Non-Rigid Structure from MotionNRSfM Short Sequences (test)
Drink Error1.19
6
3D ReconstructionSemi-dense Kinect
Mean Normalized Error0.0356
6
Showing 10 of 13 rows

Other info

Follow for update