Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Graph Representation Learning via Graphical Mutual Information Maximization

About

The richness in the content of various information networks such as social networks and communication networks provides the unprecedented potential for learning high-quality expressive representations without external supervision. This paper investigates how to preserve and extract the abundant information from graph-structured data into embedding space in an unsupervised manner. To this end, we propose a novel concept, Graphical Mutual Information (GMI), to measure the correlation between input graphs and high-level hidden representations. GMI generalizes the idea of conventional mutual information computations from vector space to the graph domain where measuring mutual information from two aspects of node features and topological structure is indispensable. GMI exhibits several benefits: First, it is invariant to the isomorphic transformation of input graphs---an inevitable constraint in many existing graph representation learning algorithms; Besides, it can be efficiently estimated and maximized by current mutual information estimation methods such as MINE; Finally, our theoretical analysis confirms its correctness and rationality. With the aid of GMI, we develop an unsupervised learning model trained by maximizing GMI between the input and output of a graph neural encoder. Considerable experiments on transductive as well as inductive node classification and link prediction demonstrate that our method outperforms state-of-the-art unsupervised counterparts, and even sometimes exceeds the performance of supervised ones.

Zhen Peng, Wenbing Huang, Minnan Luo, Qinghua Zheng, Yu Rong, Tingyang Xu, Junzhou Huang• 2020

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Node ClassificationCora
Accuracy83
1225
Node ClassificationCiteseer
Accuracy73.01
1037
Node ClassificationCiteseer (test)
Accuracy0.7638
1013
Node ClassificationCora (test)
Mean Accuracy85.09
951
Node ClassificationPubmed
Accuracy80.11
902
Node ClassificationPubMed (test)
Accuracy83.06
628
Node ClassificationPubmed
Accuracy79.9
627
Node ClassificationPubmed
Accuracy80.11
501
Node ClassificationPhoto
Mean Accuracy90.72
447
Node ClassificationChameleon (test)
Mean Accuracy62.47
425
Showing 10 of 37 rows

Other info

Follow for update