Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Entropy Minimization vs. Diversity Maximization for Domain Adaptation

About

Entropy minimization has been widely used in unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA). However, existing works reveal that entropy minimization only may result into collapsed trivial solutions. In this paper, we propose to avoid trivial solutions by further introducing diversity maximization. In order to achieve the possible minimum target risk for UDA, we show that diversity maximization should be elaborately balanced with entropy minimization, the degree of which can be finely controlled with the use of deep embedded validation in an unsupervised manner. The proposed minimal-entropy diversity maximization (MEDM) can be directly implemented by stochastic gradient descent without use of adversarial learning. Empirical evidence demonstrates that MEDM outperforms the state-of-the-art methods on four popular domain adaptation datasets.

Xiaofu Wu, Suofei hang, Quan Zhou, Zhen Yang, Chunming Zhao, Longin Jan Latecki• 2020

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Unsupervised Domain AdaptationOffice-Home
Average Accuracy69.5
238
Domain AdaptationOffice-31 unsupervised adaptation standard
Accuracy (A to W)93.4
162
Domain AdaptationVisDA 2017 (val)
Mean Accuracy79.6
52
Unsupervised Domain AdaptationSVHN → MNIST (test)--
41
Image ClassificationImageCLEF-DA
Accuracy (I -> P)78.5
37
Image ClassificationVisDA
Accuracy (plane)93.5
6
Showing 6 of 6 rows

Other info

Code

Follow for update