Deep Nearest Neighbor Anomaly Detection
About
Nearest neighbors is a successful and long-standing technique for anomaly detection. Significant progress has been recently achieved by self-supervised deep methods (e.g. RotNet). Self-supervised features however typically under-perform Imagenet pre-trained features. In this work, we investigate whether the recent progress can indeed outperform nearest-neighbor methods operating on an Imagenet pretrained feature space. The simple nearest-neighbor based-approach is experimentally shown to outperform self-supervised methods in: accuracy, few shot generalization, training time and noise robustness while making fewer assumptions on image distributions.
Liron Bergman, Niv Cohen, Yedid Hoshen• 2020
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anomaly Detection | CIFAR-10 | AUC96.2 | 120 | |
| Anomaly Detection | WBC | ROCAUC0.829 | 87 | |
| Anomaly Detection | CIFAR-100 | AUROC94.1 | 72 | |
| Anomaly Detection | FashionMNIST (test) | ROCAUC0.944 | 35 | |
| Anomaly Detection | FMNIST | Avg AUROC0.956 | 29 | |
| Anomaly Detection | DIOR | ROCAUC0.943 | 26 | |
| Anomaly Detection | CIFAR-10 32x32x3 (test) | AUPR (Class 0)93.9 | 25 | |
| Anomaly Detection | CatsVsDogs | AUROC97.3 | 19 | |
| Anomaly Detection | CIFAR-100 20 classes | AUROC83.5 | 15 | |
| Anomaly Detection | TinyImageNet 20 classes | AUROC0.847 | 15 |
Showing 10 of 25 rows