Does label smoothing mitigate label noise?
About
Label smoothing is commonly used in training deep learning models, wherein one-hot training labels are mixed with uniform label vectors. Empirically, smoothing has been shown to improve both predictive performance and model calibration. In this paper, we study whether label smoothing is also effective as a means of coping with label noise. While label smoothing apparently amplifies this problem --- being equivalent to injecting symmetric noise to the labels --- we show how it relates to a general family of loss-correction techniques from the label noise literature. Building on this connection, we show that label smoothing is competitive with loss-correction under label noise. Further, we show that when distilling models from noisy data, label smoothing of the teacher is beneficial; this is in contrast to recent findings for noise-free problems, and sheds further light on settings where label smoothing is beneficial.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image Classification | Clothing1M (test) | Accuracy73.44 | 546 | |
| Fine-grained Image Classification | CUB200 2011 (test) | Accuracy68.78 | 536 | |
| Fine-grained Image Classification | Stanford Cars (test) | Accuracy74.28 | 348 | |
| Fine-grained Image Classification | Stanford Dogs (test) | Accuracy74.7 | 117 | |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10N (Worst) | Accuracy82.76 | 78 | |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-100 Symmetric Noise (test) | Accuracy55.17 | 76 | |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10N (Aggregate) | Accuracy91.57 | 74 | |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10 Symmetric Noise (test) | Test Accuracy (Overall)90.24 | 64 | |
| Fine-grained Image Classification | Aircraft (test) | Best Accuracy65.29 | 40 | |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10N (Random 1) | Accuracy89.8 | 36 |