Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Global Texture Enhancement for Fake Face Detection in the Wild

About

Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) can generate realistic fake face images that can easily fool human beings.On the contrary, a common Convolutional Neural Network(CNN) discriminator can achieve more than 99.9% accuracyin discerning fake/real images. In this paper, we conduct an empirical study on fake/real faces, and have two important observations: firstly, the texture of fake faces is substantially different from real ones; secondly, global texture statistics are more robust to image editing and transferable to fake faces from different GANs and datasets. Motivated by the above observations, we propose a new architecture coined as Gram-Net, which leverages global image texture representations for robust fake image detection. Experimental results on several datasets demonstrate that our Gram-Net outperforms existing approaches. Especially, our Gram-Netis more robust to image editings, e.g. down-sampling, JPEG compression, blur, and noise. More importantly, our Gram-Net generalizes significantly better in detecting fake faces from GAN models not seen in the training phase and can perform decently in detecting fake natural images.

Zhengzhe Liu, Xiaojuan Qi, Philip Torr• 2020

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
AI-generated image detectionGenImage
Midjourney Detection Rate91.54
154
Generated Image DetectionGenImage (test)
Average Accuracy69.9
135
AI-generated image detectionChameleon
Accuracy60.95
127
AI-generated image detectionChameleon (test)
Accuracy61
109
Synthetic Image DetectionForenSynths (test)
Mean Accuracy52.37
60
Synthetic Image DetectionDRCT-2M
Average Score76.6
57
AI Image DetectionMidjourney
Accuracy50.02
51
AIGC Image DetectionAIGCDetect-Benchmark
ProGAN99.99
50
AI-generated image detectionGenImage 61 (test)
AUC81.71
45
Generated Image DetectionWukong
Accuracy50.8
41
Showing 10 of 105 rows
...

Other info

Follow for update