Global Texture Enhancement for Fake Face Detection in the Wild
About
Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) can generate realistic fake face images that can easily fool human beings.On the contrary, a common Convolutional Neural Network(CNN) discriminator can achieve more than 99.9% accuracyin discerning fake/real images. In this paper, we conduct an empirical study on fake/real faces, and have two important observations: firstly, the texture of fake faces is substantially different from real ones; secondly, global texture statistics are more robust to image editing and transferable to fake faces from different GANs and datasets. Motivated by the above observations, we propose a new architecture coined as Gram-Net, which leverages global image texture representations for robust fake image detection. Experimental results on several datasets demonstrate that our Gram-Net outperforms existing approaches. Especially, our Gram-Netis more robust to image editings, e.g. down-sampling, JPEG compression, blur, and noise. More importantly, our Gram-Net generalizes significantly better in detecting fake faces from GAN models not seen in the training phase and can perform decently in detecting fake natural images.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI-generated image detection | GenImage | Midjourney Detection Rate91.54 | 154 | |
| Generated Image Detection | GenImage (test) | Average Accuracy69.9 | 135 | |
| AI-generated image detection | Chameleon | Accuracy60.95 | 127 | |
| AI-generated image detection | Chameleon (test) | Accuracy61 | 109 | |
| Synthetic Image Detection | ForenSynths (test) | Mean Accuracy52.37 | 60 | |
| Synthetic Image Detection | DRCT-2M | Average Score76.6 | 57 | |
| AI Image Detection | Midjourney | Accuracy50.02 | 51 | |
| AIGC Image Detection | AIGCDetect-Benchmark | ProGAN99.99 | 50 | |
| AI-generated image detection | GenImage 61 (test) | AUC81.71 | 45 | |
| Generated Image Detection | Wukong | Accuracy50.8 | 41 |