Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

ELECTRA: Pre-training Text Encoders as Discriminators Rather Than Generators

About

Masked language modeling (MLM) pre-training methods such as BERT corrupt the input by replacing some tokens with [MASK] and then train a model to reconstruct the original tokens. While they produce good results when transferred to downstream NLP tasks, they generally require large amounts of compute to be effective. As an alternative, we propose a more sample-efficient pre-training task called replaced token detection. Instead of masking the input, our approach corrupts it by replacing some tokens with plausible alternatives sampled from a small generator network. Then, instead of training a model that predicts the original identities of the corrupted tokens, we train a discriminative model that predicts whether each token in the corrupted input was replaced by a generator sample or not. Thorough experiments demonstrate this new pre-training task is more efficient than MLM because the task is defined over all input tokens rather than just the small subset that was masked out. As a result, the contextual representations learned by our approach substantially outperform the ones learned by BERT given the same model size, data, and compute. The gains are particularly strong for small models; for example, we train a model on one GPU for 4 days that outperforms GPT (trained using 30x more compute) on the GLUE natural language understanding benchmark. Our approach also works well at scale, where it performs comparably to RoBERTa and XLNet while using less than 1/4 of their compute and outperforms them when using the same amount of compute.

Kevin Clark, Minh-Thang Luong, Quoc V. Le, Christopher D. Manning• 2020

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Natural Language UnderstandingGLUE (dev)
SST-2 (Acc)96.9
504
Natural Language UnderstandingGLUE
SST-296.9
452
Natural Language UnderstandingGLUE (test)
SST-2 Accuracy97.1
416
Question AnsweringSQuAD v1.1 (dev)
F1 Score94.9
375
Image ClassificationAircraft
Accuracy5.6
302
Question AnsweringSQuAD 2.0
F189.37
190
Natural Language InferenceSNLI
Accuracy90.11
174
Natural Language UnderstandingGLUE (val)
SST-296.9
170
Natural Language InferenceXNLI (test)
Average Accuracy81
167
Question AnsweringSQuAD v2.0 (dev)
F190.6
158
Showing 10 of 164 rows
...

Other info

Code

Follow for update