Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

LogicalFactChecker: Leveraging Logical Operations for Fact Checking with Graph Module Network

About

Verifying the correctness of a textual statement requires not only semantic reasoning about the meaning of words, but also symbolic reasoning about logical operations like count, superlative, aggregation, etc. In this work, we propose LogicalFactChecker, a neural network approach capable of leveraging logical operations for fact checking. It achieves the state-of-the-art performance on TABFACT, a large-scale, benchmark dataset built for verifying a textual statement with semi-structured tables. This is achieved by a graph module network built upon the Transformer-based architecture. With a textual statement and a table as the input, LogicalFactChecker automatically derives a program (a.k.a. logical form) of the statement in a semantic parsing manner. A heterogeneous graph is then constructed to capture not only the structures of the table and the program, but also the connections between inputs with different modalities. Such a graph reveals the related contexts of each word in the statement, the table and the program. The graph is used to obtain graph-enhanced contextual representations of words in Transformer-based architecture. After that, a program-driven module network is further introduced to exploit the hierarchical structure of the program, where semantic compositionality is dynamically modeled along the program structure with a set of function-specific modules. Ablation experiments suggest that both the heterogeneous graph and the module network are important to obtain strong results.

Wanjun Zhong, Duyu Tang, Zhangyin Feng, Nan Duan, Ming Zhou, Ming Gong, Linjun Shou, Daxin Jiang, Jiahai Wang, Jian Yin• 2020

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Table Fact VerificationTabFact (test)
Accuracy71.7
98
Fact VerificationTabFact
Accuracy74.3
73
Table Fact VerificationTabFact small (test)
Accuracy0.743
57
Table Fact VerificationTABFACT simple (test)
Accuracy85.5
39
Table Fact VerificationTABFACT complex (test)
Accuracy65.1
39
Table Fact VerificationTabFact (dev)
Accuracy71.8
28
Table-based Fact VerificationTabFact small 1.0 (test)
Accuracy74.3
26
Table Fact VerificationTABFACT (val)
Accuracy71.8
21
Table-based Fact VerificationTabFact simple 1.0 (test)
Accuracy85.4
12
Table-based Fact VerificationTabFact Small official (test)
Verification Accuracy74.3
10
Showing 10 of 12 rows

Other info

Follow for update