AMPERSAND: Argument Mining for PERSuAsive oNline Discussions
About
Argumentation is a type of discourse where speakers try to persuade their audience about the reasonableness of a claim by presenting supportive arguments. Most work in argument mining has focused on modeling arguments in monologues. We propose a computational model for argument mining in online persuasive discussion forums that brings together the micro-level (argument as product) and macro-level (argument as process) models of argumentation. Fundamentally, this approach relies on identifying relations between components of arguments in a discussion thread. Our approach for relation prediction uses contextual information in terms of fine-tuning a pre-trained language model and leveraging discourse relations based on Rhetorical Structure Theory. We additionally propose a candidate selection method to automatically predict what parts of one's argument will be targeted by other participants in the discussion. Our models obtain significant improvements compared to recent state-of-the-art approaches using pointer networks and a pre-trained language model.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inter-Turn Relation Prediction | CMV QR data | Precision18.9 | 18 | |
| Intra-turn Relation Prediction | CMV (test) | Precision16.7 | 14 | |
| Relation Type Prediction | CMV Modes (80-20 split) | Support Precision76 | 7 | |
| Relation Type Prediction | CMV Modes (50-50 split) | Support Precision72 | 7 | |
| Argumentative Component Classification | CMV (test) | F1 (Claim)67.1 | 5 |