Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

AMPERSAND: Argument Mining for PERSuAsive oNline Discussions

About

Argumentation is a type of discourse where speakers try to persuade their audience about the reasonableness of a claim by presenting supportive arguments. Most work in argument mining has focused on modeling arguments in monologues. We propose a computational model for argument mining in online persuasive discussion forums that brings together the micro-level (argument as product) and macro-level (argument as process) models of argumentation. Fundamentally, this approach relies on identifying relations between components of arguments in a discussion thread. Our approach for relation prediction uses contextual information in terms of fine-tuning a pre-trained language model and leveraging discourse relations based on Rhetorical Structure Theory. We additionally propose a candidate selection method to automatically predict what parts of one's argument will be targeted by other participants in the discussion. Our models obtain significant improvements compared to recent state-of-the-art approaches using pointer networks and a pre-trained language model.

Tuhin Chakrabarty, Christopher Hidey, Smaranda Muresan, Kathy Mckeown, Alyssa Hwang• 2020

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Inter-Turn Relation PredictionCMV QR data
Precision18.9
18
Intra-turn Relation PredictionCMV (test)
Precision16.7
14
Relation Type PredictionCMV Modes (80-20 split)
Support Precision76
7
Relation Type PredictionCMV Modes (50-50 split)
Support Precision72
7
Argumentative Component ClassificationCMV (test)
F1 (Claim)67.1
5
Showing 5 of 5 rows

Other info

Code

Follow for update