Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

On the uncertainty of self-supervised monocular depth estimation

About

Self-supervised paradigms for monocular depth estimation are very appealing since they do not require ground truth annotations at all. Despite the astonishing results yielded by such methodologies, learning to reason about the uncertainty of the estimated depth maps is of paramount importance for practical applications, yet uncharted in the literature. Purposely, we explore for the first time how to estimate the uncertainty for this task and how this affects depth accuracy, proposing a novel peculiar technique specifically designed for self-supervised approaches. On the standard KITTI dataset, we exhaustively assess the performance of each method with different self-supervised paradigms. Such evaluation highlights that our proposal i) always improves depth accuracy significantly and ii) yields state-of-the-art results concerning uncertainty estimation when training on sequences and competitive results uniquely deploying stereo pairs.

Matteo Poggi, Filippo Aleotti, Fabio Tosi, Stefano Mattoccia• 2020

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Monocular Depth EstimationKITTI (Eigen)
Abs Rel0.111
523
Depth EstimationKITTI (Eigen split)
RMSE4.756
291
Monocular Depth EstimationKITTI (Eigen split)
Abs Rel0.111
215
Monocular Depth EstimationKITTI Eigen split (test)
AbsRel Mean0.088
100
Self-supervised Monocular Depth EstimationKITTI (Eigen)
Absolute Relative Error (Abs Rel)11.1
24
Monocular Depth EstimationKITTI (test)
AbsRel AUSE0.029
7
Single-view depth estimationEndoMapper (test)
AbsRel0.234
4
Showing 7 of 7 rows

Other info

Follow for update