BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generation
About
Text generation has made significant advances in the last few years. Yet, evaluation metrics have lagged behind, as the most popular choices (e.g., BLEU and ROUGE) may correlate poorly with human judgments. We propose BLEURT, a learned evaluation metric based on BERT that can model human judgments with a few thousand possibly biased training examples. A key aspect of our approach is a novel pre-training scheme that uses millions of synthetic examples to help the model generalize. BLEURT provides state-of-the-art results on the last three years of the WMT Metrics shared task and the WebNLG Competition dataset. In contrast to a vanilla BERT-based approach, it yields superior results even when the training data is scarce and out-of-distribution.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Factual Consistency Evaluation | SummaC | CGS60.8 | 52 | |
| Summarization Evaluation | SummEval | Coherence53.3 | 41 | |
| Factual Consistency Evaluation | QAGS XSUM | Spearman Correlation12.4 | 39 | |
| Factual Consistency Evaluation | QAGS CNNDM | Spearman Correlation43.4 | 38 | |
| Factual Consistency Evaluation | TRUE benchmark | PAWS (AUC-ROC)68.4 | 37 | |
| Factual Consistency Evaluation | SummEval | Spearman Correlation23.6 | 36 | |
| Machine Translation Meta-evaluation | WMT Metrics Shared Task Segment-level 2023 (Primary submissions) | Avg Correlation0.622 | 33 | |
| Factual Consistency Evaluation | FRANK-XSum (FRK-X) | Spearman Correlation13.9 | 30 | |
| Machine Translation Meta-evaluation | MENT ZH-EN | Meta Score56.5 | 30 | |
| Machine Translation Meta-evaluation | MENT EN-ZH | Meta Score56.5 | 30 |