Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Provably Powerful Graph Networks

About

Recently, the Weisfeiler-Lehman (WL) graph isomorphism test was used to measure the expressive power of graph neural networks (GNN). It was shown that the popular message passing GNN cannot distinguish between graphs that are indistinguishable by the 1-WL test (Morris et al. 2018; Xu et al. 2019). Unfortunately, many simple instances of graphs are indistinguishable by the 1-WL test. In search for more expressive graph learning models we build upon the recent k-order invariant and equivariant graph neural networks (Maron et al. 2019a,b) and present two results: First, we show that such k-order networks can distinguish between non-isomorphic graphs as good as the k-WL tests, which are provably stronger than the 1-WL test for k>2. This makes these models strictly stronger than message passing models. Unfortunately, the higher expressiveness of these models comes with a computational cost of processing high order tensors. Second, setting our goal at building a provably stronger, simple and scalable model we show that a reduced 2-order network containing just scaled identity operator, augmented with a single quadratic operation (matrix multiplication) has a provable 3-WL expressive power. Differently put, we suggest a simple model that interleaves applications of standard Multilayer-Perceptron (MLP) applied to the feature dimension and matrix multiplication. We validate this model by presenting state of the art results on popular graph classification and regression tasks. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first practical invariant/equivariant model with guaranteed 3-WL expressiveness, strictly stronger than message passing models.

Haggai Maron, Heli Ben-Hamu, Hadar Serviansky, Yaron Lipman• 2019

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Graph ClassificationPROTEINS
Accuracy77.2
994
Graph ClassificationMUTAG
Accuracy90.6
862
Graph ClassificationNCI1
Accuracy83.2
501
Graph ClassificationCOLLAB
Accuracy81.38
422
Graph ClassificationIMDB-B
Accuracy73
378
Graph ClassificationIMDB-M
Accuracy50.46
275
Graph ClassificationDD
Accuracy77.2
273
Molecular property predictionQM9 (test)
mu0.231
229
Graph ClassificationNCI109
Accuracy82.23
223
Graph ClassificationMUTAG (10-fold cross-validation)
Accuracy90.6
219
Showing 10 of 51 rows

Other info

Follow for update