Circle Loss: A Unified Perspective of Pair Similarity Optimization
About
This paper provides a pair similarity optimization viewpoint on deep feature learning, aiming to maximize the within-class similarity $s_p$ and minimize the between-class similarity $s_n$. We find a majority of loss functions, including the triplet loss and the softmax plus cross-entropy loss, embed $s_n$ and $s_p$ into similarity pairs and seek to reduce $(s_n-s_p)$. Such an optimization manner is inflexible, because the penalty strength on every single similarity score is restricted to be equal. Our intuition is that if a similarity score deviates far from the optimum, it should be emphasized. To this end, we simply re-weight each similarity to highlight the less-optimized similarity scores. It results in a Circle loss, which is named due to its circular decision boundary. The Circle loss has a unified formula for two elemental deep feature learning approaches, i.e. learning with class-level labels and pair-wise labels. Analytically, we show that the Circle loss offers a more flexible optimization approach towards a more definite convergence target, compared with the loss functions optimizing $(s_n-s_p)$. Experimentally, we demonstrate the superiority of the Circle loss on a variety of deep feature learning tasks. On face recognition, person re-identification, as well as several fine-grained image retrieval datasets, the achieved performance is on par with the state of the art.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Person Re-Identification | Market1501 (test) | Rank-1 Accuracy96.1 | 1264 | |
| Person Re-Identification | Market 1501 | mAP87.4 | 999 | |
| Person Re-Identification | MSMT17 (test) | Rank-1 Acc76.9 | 499 | |
| Person Re-Identification | MSMT17 | mAP0.521 | 404 | |
| Person Re-Identification | Market-1501 (test) | Rank-196.1 | 384 | |
| Face Verification | LFW | Mean Accuracy99.73 | 339 | |
| Image Retrieval | CUB-200-2011 (test) | Recall@166.7 | 251 | |
| Image Retrieval | Stanford Online Products (test) | Recall@178.3 | 220 | |
| Face Verification | IJB-C | TAR @ FAR=0.01%93.95 | 173 | |
| Face Verification | LFW (test) | Verification Accuracy99.73 | 160 |